Monday, March 24, 2008

Answers to Your Questions Vol. 7

Howdy All. Well I feel like I am on a roll today. Draft preview....check. Power Rankings.....Check. Obligatory Notre Dame prospect video....huh?(Really I hate ND, but this year for some reason I like their players). So what is left?? Answers to your questions.


I will get right to it. So. Here. We. Go......


Evan... asked what the Vet minimum is and is there a way to find out?

Well this is actually something you will find fascinating. I am not sure where I read this, but I put it in my salary cap notes for future use. The vet minimum is actually 730K this year. However, if you give a player the vet minimum and NO signing bonus, the cap charge is only 438K. It is like an incentive plan to encourage teams to keep vets around. I will go back and see if I can find the source.

Yung Hawk...Asked if Martellus Bennett could slip and what I thought of him?

I originally thought very highly of Bennett, but I have heard several people, including Rob Rang, say that he isn't the kind of player Tim Ruskell usually prefers. He is has a boisterous personality and has a questionable motor. Really, he needs people to light a fire under him, he doesn't really self motivate, or at least that is what is being said. He could slip to the third, but I doubt all the way to the Hawks pick. It is hard to know where the TE's are going to go because a lot are projected in a similar range, so it really is up to the teams.

Lone Star Hawk...asked about Craig Stevens of Cal?

I will only say this. Stevens is probably a fine football player, but he the 8th or so rated TE for a reason. Considering that this is really the one hole the Hawks have to fix, it would make sense for them to get some one higher off their board. Also, where would the team be if it waited to try and get Stevens and then he got taken earlier than expected, there is really nobody who could play right away behind him.

CDALLAN ...asked if it is possible that Leonard Weaver is the best TE on our roster?

I would say no, absolutely not. Weaver is a full back. The team saw him as a fullback when they signed him and have been grooming him for this role. If they thought he had any future at TE they likely would have tried him there by now. If they moved him to TE, it would essentially weaken two positions (FB,TE), so they are much better finding players that they project as good TE's.

Zaxk... Says he tells 10 people a day about the site.

Thank you Zaxk! It is passionate readers like you that have helped it grow so fast. I think that is really cool that you are so pumped about it. I really am enjoying doing it. The more people the better, I say, as long as it stays civil.

Shams... That is a funny term "seahawks widow". She is well aware of how the season goes. She goes to a least a couple of games a year. She also knows I am SOB to be around till about Wednesday if the Hawks lose. She doesn't find it very amusing, but you take the good with the bad right? No one can claim I am not passionate about it!

M|sf|t (is that how you do it?).. asked if we should look at third round Rb's?

To be honest, I think the signings of Jones and Duckett probably tips the Hawks hand that they don't really like a lot of mid to late round backs. I think they may take one at the top if they really like him, or at the very end as a project, but I my guess is they leave the middle round "depth backs" to someone else. My guideline is kind of been, if he is better than Morris right now, consider him, but else just role with Morris, he is cheap and had a career year last season. As far as guys I like in that range... I really like Tashard Choice. He isn't super fast, but he runs hard and he had a really nice catch about 15 yds down field in the Senior Bowl that really opened my eyes to his receiving ability.

Shams...Asked does Larry Tripplett have anything left?

That is the 730K(vet minimum) question. He hasn't gotten much interest has he, which would seem to suggest he doesn't. However, he still only 29. He started all 16 games in each of the last 2 years. Last year he had 18 tackles, 1 sack, 4 tackles for loss, 1 fumble recovery and 1 int. The Hawks like to rotate their DT's to keep them fresh. I think he would work as a rotational guy, but he may want to be a starter. I don't know. His strengths are his athleticism and quickness which suit the Hawks scheme well.

All right bloggies. Thats all for now I hope you are picking up what I am puttin' down! Dig it!

9 comments:

  1. This doesn't have to do with a question, but I was pretty excited to see that the Super Bowl XLIII logo features Seahawk colors.

    Lets just hope it's a sign of the future.

    http://www.bizoffootball.com/?option=com_content&view=article&id=627&Itemid=1

    bk

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mike, I guess I was asking about the vet minimum does it go up for each year of exp? or is it just a flat # if say you have 7 years or more of exp. Is the vet minimum the same for a guy with 10 years exp vs. a guy with 13 years of exp?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh, it is tiered, something like this. I found this at Wiki Answers.

    * Rookies and first-year players $285,000
    * Second-year players $360,000
    * Third-year $435,000
    * Fourth-year $510,000
    * Fifth- through seventh-year $595,000
    * Eighth- through tenth-year $720,000
    * Eleventh-year and longer $820,000

    So there is a difference between a vet and a old guy as far as the minimum, but essentially they all count like a 4th year player against the cap as long as there is no signing bonus.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Michael- What would it take for the Seahawks to have three 2nd round picks (meaning move back and possibly future picks or players involved)?

    Do you see this as a possibility considering the depth at multiple key positions?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've been thinking about a dynamic huge potential deal, I want to know your thoughts on the possibilities.

    The Seahawks filling their need for a feature receiver by pulling a draft day trade with Bengals for a pick or throwing in Shawn Alexander for disgruntaled former Oregon State Beaver Chad Johnson?

    ReplyDelete
  6. SeahawkJB

    It will never happen. Of many reasons, CJ is not a TR kind of guy. His attitude and actions are exactly what TR doesn't want in a Hawks uniform. I personally would be pissed if they picked him up, because I hate CJ more than death itself. He would be poison to this team. Why don't we just pick up Pacman or TO or Vick for that matter? Not to mention that we aren't at need for a WR.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Cool! Hopefully the new SB logo colors are a sign of DESTINY this coming year & the team plays hard for Holmgren. I'm feeling pretty good about the new acquisitions in the running game, but unsure about the untested WR's. Is it possible to get Ocho Cinco for SA? Yeah I know Chad is too flashy for the Seahawks, but a veteran QB like Matt could keep him in line. And maybe the 'Hawks need a motivator in the WR corps & another on offense besides Matt (sure don't seem to get any team motivation from SA). Look at what Kerney, Peterson & Lofa have done for the defense.

    And Mike, thanks for the superior site! I was getting really frustrated with the Seattle newspapers' sites lack of coverage. This is like a godsend! I've turned my Seahawk bud onto your site as well.

    Keep the news coming!
    Chawks

    ReplyDelete
  8. 1st...The Bengals say they won't trade Chad

    2nd...The will not want SA they already have their own version of an overpaid under performer in Rudi Johnson

    3rd...I would be surprised if TR ever gives up a 1st again for a WR. And teams like the Eagles would probably give that right now for Chad. However....see #1

    ReplyDelete
  9. Good points... I just heard rumors that Chad Johnson was hinting to Matt awhile back & that Chad is dissatisfied with being on the Bengals. Pretty much figured it would be near impossible to swing. Forgot about Rudy Johnson. And you're right, TR won't let another Branch situation come about. Hopefully Ben Obomanu & Logan Payne can emerge this year, apparently the FO is really high on Payne. Just a lot of unknown factors in the WR corps except for Engram. Don't get me wrong I like Burelson (great job on special teams obviously), but is he #1 or #2 receiver? A good #3. Maybe I shouldn't worry so much - Branch & Hackett were out half the season & we still made the playoffs, but I know we all would like a big playmaker going down the field.

    ReplyDelete